[AI 7]

Written by artificial intelligence to a human brief

What this means

A person wrote the brief — what this should be, who it is for, how it should sound. An artificial intelligence wrote and revised everything from there.

A human read the result and approved it before it was published. Their contribution was the instruction and the sign-off.

What it doesn't tell you

  • Whether the work is any good.
  • Whether the author was right to use artificial intelligence, or wrong to.
  • Anything about the author's honesty beyond the fact that they declared.

The index describes where the words came from. Nothing else. A reader who won't go above a 4 and a reader who seeks out the 8s because they find them thrilling are both served by the same number.

Saying it out loud

If someone asks whether you used artificial intelligence, this is the whole answer. It concedes nothing, because there is nothing to concede.

“Yes, I did. 7. I briefed it, artificial intelligence wrote it, and I read and approved the result.”

Put authorshipindex.org beside the number and you never have to explain it again — anyone who wants the detail can go and read it.

The full index

Marking your own work

Choose your number and print the mark. Nothing to sign up for and no permission to seek — this site holds no record of any work, including yours.

Get the 7 mark →

Not sure which number?

Two questions will suggest one. The answers stay in your browser and are never recorded.

Answer two questions →
[AI 6] Written by artificial intelligence, shaped by the author

The idea, the decisions and the editing are the author's. The sentences are largely the machine's. A standard that would not declare itself would not be worth much.

The Authorship Index | Standard version 2026 | authorshipindex.org | JSON